Reading Sources Critically

Reading Sources Critically:

1.       Mr. Wise’s argument is that “black people decide how & when to use the N-word” no one else gets to use it.

2.       It was persuasive, he cited Jeff Foxworthy & Jeff Seinfeld. Specifically how their backgrounds affect whether they can use words like “redneck” in their act or whether it would be appropriate. He also considered other’s views by his mention of people that say things like “oh, but Dave Chappelle does it, why can’t we”.

3.       Stance: The writer opposes other people’s reasons for using the N-word (specifically some Caucasians). The writer started his career as an activist against racism & Nazism in Louisiana. I’m sure this experience affected his current stance.

4.       His publisher (Softskull press) has a definite liberal lean/agenda. Softskull is a publisher of books on race, lgbt issues, & many other social issues. I believe the writer shows that he shares similar values to that of his publisher.

5.       I do recognize ideas in the talk from the ongoing race conversation seen in the media as well as from politicians & comedians I’ve observed.

6.       Mr. Wise’s argument supports my own stance. While I do not like the N-word regardless of the source, I do respect that it’s use by the black community is not for me to judge. They can use it or condemn it’s use as they like.

7.       The intended audience appears to be the predominantly white students, staff, & guests of the talk at Boston College. His purpose is to persuade those outside the black community that it’s not okay to use the N-word even ironically, nor is it okay to judge black people that decide to use the word.